Act Three Scene Three of Journeys End by RC Sheriff Essay examples --

Act Three Scene Three of Journeys goalJourneys end, written in 1918, is a short dramatic event set in the trenches ofWorld War One. The English trench is opposite a German trench withonly sixty or so yards of no mans land between them. The melt triesto show the reality of struggle through ideas or comradeship and the mannerthat the characters interact under pressure of e very(prenominal)day life in thetrenches. The play also displays ideas of heroism through respect forother soldiers or characters. boilers suit it is the horror of war itselfthat is conveyed in this play, shown mainly through death and the life-style that had to be lead.Act three Scene three is the very pull round scene of the play. From almostthe very beginning we have known that an flame from the German armyis to be expected. However, the characters in the play are non surewhen it will take place or in what form. As the attack could transpireat any given moment the latent hostility is high throughout the pl ay.This is not the only anxiety in the hand at the beginning of Actthree Scene three. capital of North Carolina and Stanhope, the plays both most prominentcharacters, have had a large argument nigh the death of a mutualfriend, which they do not resolve in the first place the beginning of this scene.The strain between these two characters has been immense for theduration of the play. They were antecedently well acquainted butStanhope feared that Raleigh, a recent member to the company, would take badly of him as he has become an alcoholic, and thereforerefuses to acknowledge him as a friend, but just a colleague. Raleighhas found this very hard to accept.The audience is not only expecting the attack, but also for Stanhopeand Raleigh to clear the air once and for all so they can re... ...is well-nigh workingsuccessfully with others in one big apparatus. If the parts of thatmachine do not work together then it will hear down. He also wantedto portray the absolute horror and pr ejudice that war has to offer. Hedoes this extremely successfully as he makes the audience feelencapsulated in the whole experience of war. Even though he is tellingthem what it is like, he leaves freedom for them to develop their ownview on it.Overall, I think that R.C.Sherriff was trying to say that the humanside of war is futile. Nobody wins, a lot of people die withoutaccomplishing a salient deal, and from whatever angle you chose to lookat it, the whole idea is pointless, make more pain than isnecessary. Should all this commotion be vital, just to gain ground anotherthirty metres, which will most probably be chip in to the rightfulowner in due time anyway?