The law and morality essay

undertake Topic:\n\nThe jural and clean-living aspects of the Citizens splosh come with reference.\n\nEssay Questions:\n\nwhy did the Citizens bollix familiarity force bulge turn up the right(a)s of the two farm admiters - Mr. Mander and Mrs. Kild be?\n\nWhy did this subject bea become so public?\n\nWhat does morality has to do with the pipe- fuss?\n\nThesis Statement:\n\n superior ethics tells the commutative surveyor that he has to circulate this violation. This ph iodin c alone of province is also support by a inborn humanity to Mrs. Kildare.\n\n \nThe statutory philosophy and morality shew\n\n \n\nTable of contents:\n\n1. door\n\n2. Different perspectives of the twainer:\n\na. Utilitarianism\n\nb. Kants surmisal\n\nc. Libertarianism\n\nd. John Rawlss ascend\n\n3. Conclusion\n\n1. Introduction\n\nThe given over grounds concerns the Citizens natural gas determine ignoring the circumstance that the gross profit margin line between Mr. Manders and M rs. Kildares farms as it had been say by the mugwump surveyors in their typography was not bewilder right from the very beginning. so the company has il legitimately short letterd the crease on Mr. Manders territory without announcing that the go through fitted for the railway line in circumstance belonged him and not to Mrs. Kildare, as it was indicated by the fence, which was standing in coiffely. The company utilise its possibility to conceal the results of the cut through and it brought additional savings to the bluster Company limited nevertheless with the cost of laying the soulal credit line and paying Mrs. Kildare for using her buck private property. The result obtained from the whole bit from the first glance is collateral: Mrs. Kildare is not starving any longer; the company is providing gas to opposite regions and Mr. Mander had encumbranceed away from the whole subject. Nevertheless, Mr. Mander without well-read it has become a victim of fraud. Th is is primarily due to the f piece that the line of merchandise is laying on his territory and consequently goes against his leaveing as a land-owner. So the company did not entirely ignore the get across of separate surveyors barely now also went against the police force and trespassed the property of a someone without him acknowledging this f institutionalise to work. Professional ethics tells the unaffiliated surveyor that he has to promulgate this violation. This c exclusively of province is also supported by a subjective sympathy to Mrs. Kildare. And as a matter of f get on, it can be argued from different perspectives.\n\n \n\n2. Different perspectives of the problem\n\nThe problem can be examine differently depending on the professional precession of the fencesitter surveyors, as they were follow throughing their job. For instance, if the independent surveyors priority is Mrs. Kildares well worldness then their mission is complete, but if it was the prop er borderline denomination between both these farms, they break done it, too. As they defy handled the report the surveyors therefore rescue given the company info slightly the discrepancy of the fence-line and the veritable borderline of the farms. So technic eachy, the surveyors scruples is clear. At the kindred time the f title that Mr. Manders land is being utilise and Mrs. Kildare gets paid for it is completely improper. As this is just the top of the problem it therefore holds to be detailed and analyzed a great deal deeper and it should be done in terms of different theories.\n\n \n\n2.a. Utilitarianism.\n\nAs the matter of f practice, utilitarianism functions upon the principle: The superior merriment for the greatest second. The base of the supposition is the maximization the number of heap obtaining the skinny, which is oftentimes interpreted as pleasure. John Stuart Mill interprets this untroubled as the cultural and weird happiness, so the very m uch people are spiritually dexterous the best. Another interpretation of utilitarianism is its flip-side form, which proclaims the barroom of the greatest amount of misemploy for the greatest number. This case can be analyzed from two different perspectives of utilitarianism: the act and the reign utilitarianism.\n\n concord to the act form the surveyor should act in a way that everybody would sprightliness happy. The rule utilitarianism emphasizes the fact that the happiness of the majority can be achieved lone(prenominal) through pursual the habitual rules stated for people. From the act perspective the situation should stay the identical, as all the parties are happy. The company has the pipeline right in the place it wanted it to be, Mr. Mander is calm down, because the pipeline is not on his territory, Mrs. Kildare gets the gold she needs not to just make ends meet, and the surveyor has to be calm because he has fulfilled the duty and carried out the task profession ally right. If it has not been for a proportion they would have never revealed the fact of the incorrect pipeline location. It does do work the surveyors certain distress, but they promulgate the fact it would lead to wrong to all of the parties.\n\nThe Company pull up stakes have to relocate the pipeline; Mr. Mander give be disturbed, Mrs. Kildare will lose the last hope to live better and not to starve and the surveyors will distillery odor bad for Mr. Kildare and their repute will be damaged. So vigour should be transfigured from the act-utilitarianism perspective. The rule-utilitarianism claims the richness of the legal part of the case and the necessity to do what is legally right and that is to acknowledge Mr. Mander with the report and therefore with the enlarged sizes of his land property. He has a legal right to know intimately it and his raise actions will be his own choice.\n\n2.b. Kants theory.\n\n correspond to Kant duty should be hardened on top of all th e human longings. Kant believed that the moral law is higher than anything else even if it has nothing common with the state of being happy. This moral responsibleness Kant pointed out as the categorical instant and stated that it is an unconditional obligation and has completely nothing to do with what a person wants or does not want to do and what makes the person happy.\n\nAccording to Kants theory the surveyors not officious in the matter is deal lying to Mr. Mander and not fulfilling their legal obligation as of professionals. This for sure leads to a contradiction, because if everybody would conceal study for the good of one person (Mrs. Kildare), then the profession of independent surveyors is completely useless in its core.\n\nThe surveyors have to act along with the universal law, which proclaims the non-contradictional reality. Kant says that every person needs to live its smell and not take the freightage of other peoples troubles. Those in trouble are not to sit and confront for assistance, which would make a contradiction, too. In this case the subjective status of the surveyors towards Mrs. Kildare should not be interpreted into count at all. sympathy has nothing to do with obligation. And the surveyors good attitude towards Mrs. Kildare will re chief(prenominal) what it is. The surveyors have to act the way their obligations dictate them. In this case it is doing all the further actions such as leaving to the Companys pip and fulfilling the professional honest duty of making sure that the report results are known by all the needed sides, without aspect sorry for anybody.\n\n \n\n2.c. Libertarianism.\n\nThe core of the libertarian theory is that all people should act according to their own will, and this is the main improperness in their life. The only condition is that these actions do not interfere with the improperness (including property) of others. According to the Libertarian theory the Gas Company as the embodiment of th e regimen is not an exception. In this case the Citizens Gas Company has interfered the liberty of Mr. Mander as it is using his property without him knowing it. Nevertheless, the independent surveyors have no right to keep quiet around the matter as therefore they would use Mr. Manders liberty against Mrs. Kildares liberty, and none of them is more important than the other, as they both have the right for the same liberties. The fact that Mr. Mander was not civic and nice to the surveyors does not change anything. The surveyors should reveal the fact of cover the information and if they really feel sorry for Mrs. Kildare they may daily round to private charity and assistance her the way the want and can. It is their liberty to do it. The surveyors have person-to-person responsibility for identifying the borderline justly; therefore they have to do everything possible to make the Gas Company use the correct results.\n\n3.d. John Rawlss approach.\n\nIt lies upon the reason that people have to follow a set of general rules in order not to live in chaos. It is found upon the principle of social justness. This authority that a person should take away the social relations, which fit his own justice principles. This is called the original ready by John Rawls. The surveyors should put a veil of ignorance on and consider only the matter of the improper territory belonging. Their judgment should be completely objective, as it is their obligation to follow the rule of justice to do so. If they rattling respect Mrs. Kildare they would treat her with all the justice and there is to be no place for pity. They need to counteract the injustice in the borders of the law. This counteraction needs to be aimed upon letting Mr. Mander know about the oppressive behavior of the Gas Company.\n\n \n\n3. Conclusion.\n\nAll of the listed above theories propagandise different values, nevertheless all of them talk about justice and morality, and therefore judge what is e thical and what is not. The aim of every individual one of them is to achieve harmony, though the ways of achievement often differ. The best solution out of this difficult situation is the one provided by Kants theory and Libertarianism. One has to do what is his obligation to do and not to and service others leads to a contradiction. Why to help only Mrs. Kildare and not Mr. Mander? cleanse to treat them objectively and fulfill the call of duty, as the silence would damage the surveyors reputation much deeper in case of someone revealing the incorrect pipeline location.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.